Statements of Faith
Recently I’ve noticed two new ’statement’s of faith’ written in narrative rather than bullets:
The Crowded House and Project Church.
When these stories are compared to a more tradition-style doctrinal basis (e.g. Affinity, FIEC, Gospel Coalition) I can’t help but think that the narrative style ones are better.
That’s not to say that they other type is wrong, to be honest, I really love the Gospel Coalition one – it’s to extensive and attempts to communicate the some of the fullness of the gospel. But it does seem that one needs more than a basic understanding of Early Church history and vocabulary to understand them.
Whereas narrative ones – well they’re stories. They tell God’s story, and they minimise Christian jargon. And if you require church member to wholeheartedly understand and agree with a DB, then surely we need to make then as accessible as possible…?